
This section provides a checklist for carrying out a quality audit of each of the stages of the resettlement process.
For each of the 14 stages, we consider the Aims set out in the Resettlement Handbook, and then suggestions for how to audit whether the service is meeting those aims in theory (policy and procedure) and in practice (actual case studies).
1. Referral | 2. Introduction | 3. Assessment | 4. Housing options | 5. Resettlement planning/support planning | 6. Referral on (multi-agency working) | 7. Gearing up for change | 8. Preparation for the move | 9. The move | 10. Settling in | 11. Post move-on support | 12. Flying solo! | 13. Evaluation | 14. Safety net | And... auditing the ethos!
AIMS:
QUESTIONS TO ASK:
Does the service have clear written aims and objectives?
Does the service have clear written referral criteria, procedures and allocations policies?
Are these available to all prospective referral agencies and applicants?
Does the service provide written explanations to unsuccessful applicants, giving the procedure, grounds and time scales for appeals or reapplication?
back to index
AIMS:
QUESTIONS TO ASK:
Are there clear timescales and agendas for induction to the service?
Are clients provided with clear, written, key information, such as:
back to index
AIMS:
QUESTIONS TO ASK:
Does the service conduct a needs assessment which identifies:
accessing services
dealing with authority and bureaucracy
benefits and budgeting,
housekeeping and hygiene
mental health,
sexual health
substance use
healthy diets
employment
training
education
leisure
Does the process involve the client in self assessment?
How could it?
Does the assessment take into account the client's own aspirations?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the assessment include any grounds for housing priority/ barriers to rehousing?
Does the assessment include any grounds for accessing special needs housing?
Does the service give the client access to local authority, housing association and private rented sector property lists, application forms, allocations policies, etc?
Does the service encourage user involvement in the housing options?
Does the service have a move on strategy?
Does the service offer its own move on accommodation, and are there clear, accessible, written procedures for allocations?
Are the housing options chosen realistic in terms of availability, household type and needs, likely timescale, etc?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service offer minimum standards for the frequency of planning/review meetings?
Are the outcomes of meetings recorded, including the who, when and how for any action agreed?
Does the client receive/countersign a record of the meeting? Can the client bring their own issues to the agenda? Are targets/goals that are set 'SMART'? i.e. Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Timescaled
Are agendas/timescales for the following meeting set each time?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service provide access to/liaise with other statutory services, such as:
- Social services
- Community mental health teams
- Community teams for learning disabilities,
- probation service etc
Does the service provide access to/liaise with other voluntary agencies, in appropriate areas of concern?
Does the service provide joint three-way planning between the agencies and the client?
Are staff trained in the roles, responsibilities and services of other agencies?
Does the service take account of informal support networks, such as family and friends?
back to index
AIMS:
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service maintain contact/planning with the client during the waiting period?
Does the service address other support issues/client aspirations during the interim period?
Are support/action plans flexible enough to allow for changes of circumstances/relapse during the interim period?
Does the service have a good handover procedure to another worker/service?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service enable clients to plan inventories of furniture, equipment, etc.?
Are there storage arrangements/facilities?
Does the service enable clients to access assistance towards 'move-on': e.g. community care grants, the social fund, charitable sources, rent deposit schemes, decoration grants, community furniture schemes, etc?
Does the service enable clients to get best value for money e.g. company accounts, wholesale prices?
Does the service enable clients to ensure all utilities are connected, e.g. gas, electricity, water?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service offer/enable the client to access practical assistance on the day?
Does the service take into account the role of statutory, voluntary, and informal support networks to offer practical and emotional support on the day?
Does the move include an 'induction' to the new property, including practicalities (meters, stop taps, smoke alarms, fuse boxes) and paperwork (tenancies, housing benefit, council tax)?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service establish regular contact with the client after the move, on a tapering basis?
Does the service offer a 'crisis intervention' contact during the initial period of independence?
Does the service enable clients to develop new local networks, such as:
See the section on the local environment in Theory.
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service maintain contact with the client beyond the move?
Are there minimum standards for the frequency of contact? Is contact planned, agenda-ed and recorded as per 'Resettlement planning', and 'Gearing up for change'?
Are there arrangements in place for contact in a crisis?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Are milestones set with the clients' agreement towards when the tenancy can be maintained independently? Are alternative or ongoing statutory, voluntary or informal support networks established prior to withdrawal?
Are arrangements in place for the formal notification to the housing provider of the closure of the support package from the resettlement service?
Does the withdrawal allow for changes of circumstances, failure of the tenancy, or contingency plans for support in specific areas? (See Safety Net).
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service complete a written evaluation of each client case, regardless of the outcome of the case?
Are evaluations used as a basis for reviewing the service's policies and practice?
Are clients asked to complete exit interviews, customer satisfaction surveys, etc?
Are clients' views used as the basis for reviewing the service's policies and practices?
back to index
AIMS
QUESTIONS TO ASK
Does the service allow clients to re-enter at the appropriate stage of the process?
Are there any barriers to re-entry (e.g. rent arrears, tenancy breaches)? Is this information given clearly to clients? If it is possible, was the tenancy closure positively dealt with?
back to index

This could be seen as a part of the evaluation, but having given it such significance at the outset, we should make it an item in its own right. Again, it's relatively easy to audit the service's ethos in theory: displays of multi-cultural images, positive images of gay men, minicom services and wheelchair access may suggest a strong commitment to Equal Opportunities, but do not give much insight into actual working practice.
More important are the views of the service users - whether through complaints and suggestions schemes, tenants' and service users' groups, exit interviews or customer satisfaction surveys.
The only real way to know is to get the answers to the questions:
back to top