This stage, originally written for the Resettlement Handbook(1998), has been revised and updated thanks to Mike Seal's critique of it in his excellent "Resettling Homeless People: theory and practice" published by Russell House Publishing, 2005. The critique is part of the 12th chapter: An Operational Model for Resettlement revisited.
Endings | Cognitive aims | Emotional aims | Practical aims | Tasks | Co-ordination | Advocacy | Standards | Evaluation
The stage at which the client is to 'fly solo' is often determined by the nature and ethos of the project, informed by consideration of needs, and dictated by the contracts or funding requirements.
It is important to look at the profiles of the clients using your project, and decide an appropriate procedure for closing cases. The three choices are:
For each client you should have worked out with them a clear way of finishing the support, when that will come and under what circumstances.
While the current situation is that duration of contact and potential referral on to other support agencies, floating support or tenancy sustainment teams it is interesting to consider the Dutch model, as outlined in Resettling Homeless People whereby support is withdrawn only when the client has two positive relationships apart from the worker.
The luxury of such open ended support carries in itself considerations of dependency versus real independence, and as one practioner replied:
"you can know it is over when the aims, as they were outlined by the client, have been achieved."
If the aims agreed at the outset have been met and look to be sustainable, the worker can happily end the intervention.
Seal quotes Meyersohn, K and Walsh, J 2001 in Ending Clinical relationships with people with schizophrenia Health and social work
"Natural unsettling feelings for the client may include sadness, relief, loss, anger, guilt, inadequacy and anxiety...feelings of satisfaction may include pride in accomplishments, an appreciation of the relationship and excitement about the capacity for other attachments. Most clients have mixed feelings, but the worker can frame the ending as a positive episode in the client's management of separation. Near the end of the relationship the worker may share some of his or her own reactions...this highlights reciprocity in the relationship."
As Seal notes, "However, practitioners' experience was...that most relationships ended with either a 'bang' or a 'whimper': The relationship ended after an argument or misdemeanour, the worker eventually stopped knocking, and/or the client stopped answering. A third variation was that the client sought to perpetuate the relationship even when objectively the task was done. Whenever the discussion or plan turned to the idea of the worker withdrawing support, the client presented with a crisis."
back to index
back to index

Next section: Evaluation