This section looks at how collaboration and partnership working between different agencies can improve delivery and co-ordination of services that seek to end rough sleeping.
The Networking and partnerships page details achievement levels and examples of evidence for organisations wishing to improve their working with other agencies.
Partnership working is a positive method of providing services that draw upon a wide base of skills and experiences. On an individual basis, working in partnership brings together all the agencies that have come into contact with a rough sleeper (e.g. police, DAT, outreach) to find the most appropriate interventions. Case conferencing (see below) is a method of agreeing the best interventions based on service experiences for each rough sleeper. On a collective basis, effective partnership working between statutory agencies, and between statutory agencies and the voluntary sector, can have a distinctive role in tackling rough sleeping across a local area.
Formal partnerships are those with protocols, terms of reference and regular meetings. Informal partnerships operate without these formal structures but are developed working relationships on an inter-agency basis. The Homeless Link good practice in tackling rough sleeping through street outreach services report shows that many agencies have successfully implemented both these approaches in order to tackle rough sleeping.
Case conferences and tasking and targeting meetings bring together street outreach teams and other related agencies.
Case Conferences – these are concerned with a single individual with a focus on finding solutions to his/her rough sleeping.
Tasking and targeting – these meetings have a broader focus on street activity for a larger group of individuals.
Both these meetings have a case management approach. Group decisions are made for each individual with actions or support undertaken by all, some or one of the involved services.
Possible attendees at case conferencing or tasking and rargeting meetings include:
In some areas, case conferencing meetings have referral rights or influence over hostel places. Case conferences that have included hostel managers have been successful in reducing rates of eviction. ‘Reciprocal breathing space’ arrangements – where pre-emptive transfers occur between hostels – discussed in joint meetings can support difficulties within hostels which might otherwise lead to an eviction.
Multi-agency case lists and conferences have several benefits that build on a persistent, assertive and co-ordinated approach which include:
London’s Street Rescue has an innovative partnership with LAS; LAS contact Street Rescue when they come in to contact with someone who has no fixed abode, either on the streets or in Accident and Emergency. The benefits of this include the ability to track rough sleepers across local authorities’ boundaries. For both agencies this relationship enhances their duty of care.
The Bradford City Project has worked closely with the police to help increase awareness of homelessness issues with trainee police students. The project has also helped produce a pocket sized aide-memoire to help officers signpost rough sleepers to appropriate local services.
These are some recommended good practice approaches for frontline staff when working in partnership with other organisations:

Checklist for positive partnership working
Has the agency identified any possible networks or partnerships to develop or join?
If the organisation is developing a new network, have the right partners been identified and contacted?
Are enforcement, police and health services regularly contributing to meetings?
What are the roles of the meeting stakeholders? Can different agencies take responsibility for particular issues? Are the working styles of each service compatible? If not, can an effective compromise be reached?
Have local hostel managers been invited to contribute to meetings? Can reciprocal breathing space arrangements be developed?
How is on-going intelligence going to be recorded? Who is responsible for maintaining this material?
Can service user involvement in meetings be achieved? Does a rough sleeper have the opportunity to be at his or her own meeting or to give feedback on outcomes of meetings?
Back: Strategic partnership working